Google has filed an appeal against a landmark US district court ruling. The court found the company illegally maintained monopoly power in online search.
Google said users select its services voluntarily, not under pressure. Lee-Anne Mulholland, vice president for regulatory affairs, responded to the August 2024 decision. She argued the ruling misrepresented why people rely on Google products.
Company disputes court’s view of competition
Google announced the appeal on Friday and criticised Judge Amit Mehta’s conclusions. The company said the ruling ignored rapid technological innovation. It also argued the court underestimated competitive pressure from rivals.
Google requested a pause on enforcing the remedies. Some analysts described the measures as limited in scope. Google warned that immediate enforcement could disrupt markets and hinder innovation.
Judge recognises AI impact but rejects breakup
Judge Mehta acknowledged rapid changes in Google’s business when issuing remedies in September. He wrote that generative artificial intelligence reshaped the trajectory of the case.
He rejected a government proposal to break up Google. That plan included spinning off Chrome, the world’s most widely used browser.
Instead, the judge imposed narrower measures. Google must share selected data with competitors approved by the court.
Orders to share search data face resistance
The shared data would include parts of Google’s search index. That index acts as a vast map of online content.
Judge Mehta also ordered Google to let certain rivals display its search results. He said the step would give smaller companies time and resources to innovate.
Mulholland criticised the requirements on Friday. She said forced data sharing and syndication threatened privacy and discouraged competitors from developing independent products.
AI expansion draws regulatory attention
Google has sharply increased investment in artificial intelligence across its products. Regulators have raised concerns over how AI affects competition and publishers.
Last month, the European Union opened an investigation into Google’s AI summaries. Those summaries appear above standard search results.
The European Commission said it would review Google’s use of website content. It also questioned whether publishers received fair compensation. Google said the inquiry risks slowing innovation in a competitive market.
This week, Google parent Alphabet reached a market value of four trillion dollars. Only three other companies have ever reached that milestone.
