Tesla approaches a historic moment in corporate history. Ahead of Thursday’s annual general meeting, the company has launched a high-profile campaign to persuade shareholders that Elon Musk deserves a $1 trillion pay package. Digital ads highlight his accomplishments, while Votetesla.com features board chair Robyn Denholm and director Kathleen Wilson-Thompson praising Musk as dramatic music plays. Investor opinion remains split. The meeting in Austin, Texas, could become a referendum on Musk’s leadership. His political statements and unpredictable behavior have made him one of the most polarizing figures in modern business. On X, the platform he owns, Musk warned that Tesla’s success “could affect the future of civilization.” He also amplified support from allies including Michael Dell, Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood, and his brother Kimbal, a Tesla board member. “There is no one remotely close to my brother,” Kimbal said. Musk replied: “Thanks bro ❤️.”
Shareholders voice concern
Some investors see the pay package as a reflection of Tesla’s broader challenges. Car sales have slowed, and critics argue Musk has shifted attention away from the company’s core mission. “It’s remarkable that a company struggling to sell cars spends money promoting a pay package,” said Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management. He has reduced his Tesla holdings and grown increasingly critical. “Tesla must return to its roots—building and selling electric vehicles,” he said.
The trillion-dollar challenge
Musk’s proposed package does not provide $1 trillion upfront. Instead, it sets a performance goal: raise Tesla’s market value from $1.4 trillion to $8.5 trillion. He must also oversee the deployment of one million “Robotaxi” self-driving vehicles, despite slow progress. Meeting these goals would earn Musk 423.7 million new shares, worth nearly $1 trillion at the target valuation. Tesla has not commented on its campaign to gain shareholder support.
This is not Musk’s first pay controversy. A previous multibillion-dollar plan rewarded him for boosting Tesla’s market value tenfold. Though he achieved that milestone, a Delaware judge voided the deal in 2024, citing conflicts of interest with the board. The Delaware Supreme Court is reviewing the case while Tesla pursues this even larger package.
“Tesla continues to operate outside normal corporate norms,” said Columbia Law professor Dorothy Lund. “They are far from a model of good governance.” She noted that campaigns like this typically arise when activist investors threaten major changes, not over executive pay. “I’ve never seen anything like it,” she said.
Both Elon and Kimbal Musk will vote on the proposal, giving them significant influence. Musk, already the world’s richest man, became the first known half-trillionaire earlier this year.
Board defends its CEO
Tesla insists Musk is essential. The company says he “uniquely possesses the leadership qualities needed to achieve its long-term mission.” Wilson-Thompson explained the board spent seven months consulting legal and pay experts to design the package. Musk emphasized that the real issue is control, not money, saying he needs authority to guide Tesla’s future.
Critics argue the board has overstepped. “A board should represent shareholders, not advocate for a CEO,” said Yale professor Matthew Kotchen, co-author of a study analyzing Musk’s recent impact on Tesla’s reputation.
Institutional investors have opposed the plan. Proxy advisers Glass Lewis and ISS recommend rejecting the package, calling it excessive and harmful to shareholder value. Norway’s sovereign wealth fund and U.S. pension giant CalPERS have pledged to vote no. New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli urged investors to oppose Tesla directors, citing failure to provide “independent oversight and accountability.”
A vote that could redefine Tesla
With major institutions resisting the plan, Musk may rely on Tesla’s retail investors, who often support him. Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas called Thursday’s vote “one of the most important events in Tesla’s history,” warning the proposal could fail.
Criticism outside Tesla continues. Protests have persisted since Musk’s brief and controversial role in Donald Trump’s administration earlier this year. “It’s hard to imagine Musk quickly repairing the damage to Tesla’s brand,” said Kotchen.
Still, supporters remain confident. “Musk’s vision and personality have drawn more attention to Tesla than almost any CEO,” said Edmunds’ Jessica Caldwell. “He’s polarizing, but investors still believe he can achieve the extraordinary.”
The ultimate question looms: will Tesla shareholders approve Musk’s $1 trillion plan—or finally signal the limits of his influence?
